Wikipedia overdose
spaljeni —Fri, 04/02/2010 - 07:25
Ones to delete:
http://userlogos.org/node/88 - nice, but not transparent, no reflection
http://userlogos.org/node/9790 - blurry, not sure if it fits into template
http://userlogos.org/node/9763 - dissapears on white bg
http://userlogos.org/node/11402 - not transparent
http://userlogos.org/node/9790 - iphone style. blurry, not sure if it fits the template
http://userlogos.org/node/9188 - no comment
http://userlogos.org/node/8155 - what's up with the rainbow + text dissapears on black bg
http://userlogos.org/node/3626 - not transparent, inverted
http://userlogos.org/node/5993 - just a globe on a white bg.
http://userlogos.org/node/158 - inverted globe on a black bg
http://userlogos.org/node/5801 - another one on a white bg
http://userlogos.org/node/5325 - not sure about this one, it's nice but it is smaller that 400 x 300 px and there are others just like it
http://userlogos.org/node/5072 - what happened here?
http://userlogos.org/node/4059 - text dissapear on black bg, text also a bit blurry
http://userlogos.org/node/4060 & http://userlogos.org/node/4063 - essentially the same logo, same creator, badly cut letters
http://userlogos.org/node/3114 & http://userlogos.org/node/3115- same creator as above, not transparent, blurry
http://userlogos.org/node/3474 - text dissapear on black
http://userlogos.org/node/2059 - not sure what's going on here
http://userlogos.org/node/1754 - small, black bg
http://userlogos.org/node/2724 - small, what's up with that rainbow?
http://userlogos.org/node/2453 - again a globe on a black bg
http://userlogos.org/node/2578 - and again
http://userlogos.org/node/720 - and again
http://userlogos.org/node/327 - and again
http://userlogos.org/node/786 - and again, and blurry too
Ones to keep:
http://userlogos.org/node/10412 - not bad
http://userlogos.org/node/291 - very nice
http://userlogos.org/node/1553 - these are nice, although I'm not a fan of "glow"
http://userlogos.org/node/7759 - iphone style, great work
http://userlogos.org/node/6496 - inverted, transparent, works on any bg
http://userlogos.org/node/2390
http://userlogos.org/node/2479 - these are very nice (except the last one)
Search logos
Search site
Navigation
User login
Online users
Recent comments
-
by: mrbee6 days 16 hours ago
-
by: normantonjp1 week 5 days ago
-
by: CutePharma1 week 5 days ago
-
by: CutePharma1 week 6 days ago
-
by: duort2 weeks 1 day ago
-
by: CutePharma2 weeks 1 day ago
-
by: CutePharma2 weeks 3 days ago
-
by: CutePharma2 weeks 5 days ago
Re: Wikipedia overdose
Submitted by chiaroscuro on Fri, 04/02/2010 - 07:33Wow you have been busy !!!
2724 the rainbow one I don't like at all, but some I think do !
That is typical gmacri !
Re: Wikipedia overdose
Submitted by jumpordie on Fri, 04/02/2010 - 09:542059 disagreed.
on the others agrees.
Logo or Die!
Logo or Die! ● Please vote for logos
Re: Wikipedia overdose
Submitted by chiaroscuro on Fri, 04/02/2010 - 10:10You know the Gmacri logos, I have been looking at them.
They are all a bit strange, but maybe strange people like them.. :-)
That is the one with the rainbow...
Re: Wikipedia overdose
Submitted by spaljeni on Fri, 04/02/2010 - 15:112059 is not bad at all, I just don't get the text placement (over the reflection?!) and the text also disappears on a black bg
2724 - well dunno how to comment on this, really.
text in the corner, black background, and the rainbow thing?
only worse than that is the 768 which is obviously scaled up, blurry and just awful
even the text has some white residue around itself, despite the background being black
both of these are Gmarci's btw
Re: Wikipedia overdose
Submitted by macleod.mac on Mon, 04/05/2010 - 06:04Disagree with 5325, can't just delete because it's small. 5072 is fairly innovative, might fit into a certain theme someone has.
Agree with 4060 / 4063, but just delete one of them... they're not that bad.
Agree to delete 3114/3115
I disagree with 3474, although it's not transparent, I still kinda like it :)
I've been defending gmacri, but 786 is just awful. Delete!
We can't delete just because they're not transparent though, as long as they're still of good quality we should keep. Some people still use them, I'm sure.
We ~macleod.mac
Click Here to Request a Logo / Just ask if you want one of my source PNGs
Re: Wikipedia overdose
Submitted by spaljeni on Mon, 04/05/2010 - 07:09Cannot disagree with what you said, but like you see there are 30+ Wikipedia logos on the site and most of them are reworks of the previous one (scaled up/down resulting in a blurred logo, text changed to another language, inverted image etc.)
And I'm sure Wikipedia is not the only site that has a ton of logos created for it.
Also most users tend to request/use transparent logos with reflection on their FD page.
I think We should keep only the good transparent ones and one of each language for easy access through the search function.