No. If I understand corectly 'Organize Bookmarks' is not a landing page interface containing all one's links clickable directly from that page, and rearrangeable by drag-clicking. Organize Bookmarks is variation upon standard Firefox bookmarks navigation: scroll-menus and searching through folders. Yes?

<< Even thought needs space >>

Is that actually intended to be an answer?

If so, then:

Thought needs space -- space which is not eaten up by useless and pointless space-grabbers.

<< Perhaps you could take up his offer and see how you get on. >>

While I appreciate the offer -

Again:

It's pointless. Useless blank space which has nothing within it, OR useless blank space with redundant title text floating in it -- is still useless blank space.

Autohome is not the same concept. For one thing, it's not drag and drop navigation.

It's baffling that you guys are so utterly resistant to adding a simple yet vast enhancement.

All you need is a toggle in the prefs to keep or collapse logo space, coupled with an expansion from your present 10x10 maximum layout parameter to the 10x500 (or so) the page would then be able to contain.
You've got a fixed concept that we all want a page cluttered with logos or tiny screen captures...and you're refusing to let that concept morph, only defending and yet again defending the status quo.

I'm glad you find your cartoon amusing, though I'm not getting from this conversation that anybody here is all too awesome at all, only people who oh so firmly believe they are -- which is the worst kind of boor. Seems like a lot of legends_in_their_own_minds. It's a telling cartoon, really.

Whatever... I give up.

mafi0z, I appreciate the open dialogue.

And Mafia_Penguin, you might want to take another look at that smarmy cartoon signature of yours and what it implies, whether consciously or unconsciously. Lotta cartoons out there to choose from; you might want to wonder why you chose that specific one, and why you find it funny or even only mildly amusing, if even. No diff to me, but heads up - waliking around even slightly like your cartoon friend is not likely to get you laid. Or employed.
No offense intended, sincerely, and with all due respect

Anyway -

I greatly appreciate that you are at least willing to experiment with cell size. That's encouraging. And if not 10x500, then 10x100; whatever works. I am speaking somewhat from ignorance here, but it seems to me a page made of html text would be a lot less memory intensive than a page made of graphics, right?